Geospatial data acquisition

Helena Mitasova

GIS/MEA582 Geospatial Modeling and Analysis NCSU

Learning objectives

  • Understand the diversity of geospatial data sources
  • Classify modern mapping technologies
  • Understand the concept of georeferenced data
  • Explain differences between the basic coordinate reference systems (CRS)
  • Use CRS standards to find parameters for a given CRS
  • Understand concept of re-projection between CRSs

Geospatial data acquisition

Current revolution in mapping technologies:

continuous data collection anywhere by anyone

Professional mapping technologies

  • passive and active aerial and satellite sensors
  • ground-based surveys : (RTK)GPS, total station, lidar
  • in situ sensors: e.g., air quality, river stages, water quality, soil moisture

Emergence of autonomous platforms: air, ground, water

Remote sensing: passive

Numerous satellite and airborne platforms and sensors, e.g:

  • Landsat 1-8: landcover since 1972, 30m, multispectral
  • Terra: MODIS temperature 250m; ASTER radiance, DEM 15m
  • SENTINEL-2 MSI: landcover, 10m, multispectral
  • PLANET: new generation of small satellites: 170 small satellites mapping Earth daily at 3m resolution
See overview of Remote Sensors by NASA

Learn in GIS512 Introduction to Environmental Remote Sensing

Remote sensing: active

Satellite and airborne platforms and sensors, examples:

See overview of Remote Sensors by NASA

Learn in GIS512 Introduction to Environmental Remote Sensing

Satellite Remote Sensing

SRTM and LANDSAT example for Panama:



Images and data by NASA and NCSU MEAS

Satellite Remote Sensing

PLANET images for Jockey's Ridge change between September 2017 and July 2018 mapped at 3m resolution:

Data by planet.com

Airborne Remote Sensing

Lidar and orthophoto example for NCSU fields - sub-meter resolution mapping:

Most current systems combine active and passive sensors

Airborne Remote Sensing

3D construction site mapping at cm resolution using small unmanned aerial system (drone)

Mapped in 2021 by William Reckling, NCSU graduate student
NCSU GeoForAll Lab 3D models from UAS on sketchfab,
learn in GIS584 Mapping and Analytics Using UAS

Ground-based passive

Airborne orthophoto compared with on-ground mobile 360 degree camera streetview

Credits: Orthphoto from NC One Map, Ground-based image from Google streetview

Ground-based active

Terrestrial lidar: monitoring eroding stream bank at mm resolutions

Credits: Photo and data by Nathan Lyons, NCSU graduate student, 3D model by Helena Mitasova

Non-traditional data sources

Widespread GPS enabled technology:

  • smartphones
  • webcams (AMOS)
  • mobile sensor networks : cars, bicycles, scooters
  • smart devices (internet of things): trash cans, utilities

Time spent by group of people along a guided tour, displayed over lidar-based DSM Mitas et al., 2020

From mapping to GIS

Acquired data are transformed into georeferenced, discrete representations of landscape features

  • georeferencing (often in real-time using GPS)
  • feature or theme extraction (e.g. image classification)
  • building GIS data model representation
    (geometry, attributes, time)
  • generating metadata

Georeferencing

Georeferenced data: location on Earth is represented in a Coordinate Referenced System (CRS)

  • geodetic (geographic) coordinate system:
    geoid -- ellipsoid -- latitude/longitude

  • projected reference systems:
    geoid -- ellipsoid -- developable surface -- plane -- x,y

Geodetic (Geographic) CRS

geoid -- ellipsoid -- latitude/longitude

  • GPS, large regions, data exchange
  • units: degree-minutes-seconds
  • complex algorithms for distances, areas

Projected CRS

Projected reference systems (there are many):
geoid -- ellipsoid -- developable surface -- plane -- x,y

  • developable surfaces: conic, cylindrical, azimuthal
  • type of distortion: conformal, equidistant, equal area

Map projection transitions Cartographic projections by Furuti

National and state CRS

Defined by:

  • Reference spheroid/geoid and datum:
    e.g. GRS80-NAD83, WGS84, NATR2022
  • Projection and its parameters, e.g. :
    • Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC): states in US
    • Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM): USGS, military
    • Albers Equal Area (conic): USGS national map
  • Vertical datum: e.g. NAVD88 North american Vertical Datum 1988, NAPGD2022

NAD83 and NAVD88 to be replaced in 2022 with North American Terrestrial Reference Frame (NATR2022) and North American-Pacific Geopotential Datum of 2022 (NAPGD2022)

CRS standards

International Organization of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP) Surveying and Positioning Committee, established standard for CRS definition with assigned EPSG codes (initiated by European Petroleum Survey Group - EPSG)

Find the codes and CRS representation in many formats here epsg.io Example: EPSG:4326 WGS84 used in GPS

Transition towards ISO WKT 19162:2018 international standard notation (WKT:well known text, text markup language)

CRS for North Carolina

Search for NC at epsg.io returns 72! CRS

Most common EPSG (see WKT definition in epsq.io for details)

  • 4152 geoid to elipsoid projection
  • 3358 NAD83(HARN)/NC(meter)
  • 3404 NAD83(HARN)/NC(feet)

Projected CRS EPSG 3358 includes geoid to elipsoid projection (EPSG 4152) and elipsoid to plane projection (3358), the units on the map are meters, not degrees
New CRS: North Carolina State Plane Coordinate System (NCSPCS) 2022

Popular Visualization CRS

Most common in on-line mapping systems:
Pseudo-Mercator

EPSG statement

We have reviewed the coordinate reference system used by Google, etc. and believe that it is technically flawed. We will not devalue the EPSG dataset by including such inappropriate geodesy and cartography.”
In 1989, North American professional geographic organizations called for a ban on all rectangular coordinate maps (especially Mercator).

https://geography.about.com/library/weekly/aa030201b.htm
https://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WorldMapProjections/

Popular Visualization CRS

The reference system was eventually included as EPSG 3857 - it is not recommended for professional work

See explanation of the distortions animation and equations in an article about Mercator

Popular Visualization CRS

World map in Pseudo Mercator with massive distortions farther from the equator, compared with Winkel-Tripel projection with more realistic representation

Coordinate systems in GIS

Representation of coordinate systems in GIS
  • Metadata file
  • EPSG codes
  • ESRI PRJ file
  • PROJ format
  • Transition towards ISO WKT 19162:2018 international standard notation (WKT)

EPSG translated to input parameters of the PROJ software
NAD83(High Accuracy Reference Network HARN) / North Carolina
<3358> +proj=lcc +lat_1=36.16666666666666 +lat_2=34.33333333333334
+lat_0=33.75 +lon_0=-79 +x_0=609601.22 +y_0=0 +ellps=GRS80 +units=m +no_defs

Coordinate transformations

Geospatial data often come in different CRS, e.g.:

  • Federal agencies: Geodetic CRS (WGS84), Albers equal area, UTM
  • State agencies: State Plane CRS
  • Older data may have different datums (NAD27, NAD83)

Coordinate transformations

x,y -> longitude, latitude -> x’,y’

often performed on-fly, may be inaccurate and time consuming
for projects with high accuracy requirements: first reproject all data into a suitable common CRS, then perform analysis and modeling

Summary

  • we provided overview of modern technologies for geospatial data acquisition
  • we explained the concept of coordinate reference systems and related standards

Explore The true size

⌂